Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NYer

Pretty mysterious. If this was indeed an encrypted musical piece, why would the builders of the church encrypt it so?


5 posted on 05/02/2007 6:50:01 AM PDT by Dutchguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Dutchguy
Probably was not encrypted at the time.

Can you read Norse runes? Sanskrit?

Old writing is encrypted if you can not read it. It was not until the finding of the Rosetta stone that Egyptian hieroglyphs and cuneiform were translatable. No one could read them because no one spoke those languages any more.

9 posted on 05/02/2007 7:07:38 AM PDT by fireforeffect (A kind word and a 2x4, gets you more than just a kind word.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Dutchguy
why would the builders of the church encrypt it

Written music is encrypted even now. The encryption is standardized as notation, but when this piece was done the modern standard did not exist. Even so, modern avant-garde composers sometimes use non-standard notation and if you don't know the code nothing but gibberish will result.

26 posted on 05/02/2007 8:14:44 AM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the Treaty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Dutchguy

This may be of interest to you:

http://www.casca.ca/ecass/issues/2005-me/features/turner/Stars%20of%20St_John’s.html

Another example of someone secretly leaving their imprint in a church.


34 posted on 05/02/2007 5:10:55 PM PDT by Straight Vermonter (Posting from deep behind the Maple Curtain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson