Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ilovew
I did have a position or you wouldn't have challenged it. By challenging it you infer that you have an opposing position.

That's not too hard to understand. That's the nature of a discussion forum. It's very much like a discussion in any other medium.

If my question is irrelevant you ought to be able to explain why it's irrelevant. I clarified my position quite crisply in post #51 so my original tongue-in-cheek post shouldn't be confusing you now.

60 posted on 04/29/2007 3:08:35 PM PDT by TigersEye (For Democrats; victory in Iraq is not an option.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: TigersEye

I did explain why it’s irrelevant. I don’t know of any definition of civil union that includes animals. Thus, the irrelevance of your question. If the definition is confusing you, though, here ya go: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/civil%20union

I looked at all the definitions, they don’t mention animals.


62 posted on 04/29/2007 3:11:31 PM PDT by ilovew (Almost a college graduate!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson