Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: A. Pole
I disagree. A person's track record as a biased individual is always relevant when considering his writings.

In Manson's case, his evil and insanity would require that the text be examined with special care for lies and inchoate thinking.

In Mother Theresa's case, we could be confident that she was telling the truth, even if we happened to disagree with her.

Vanden Heuvel is well known for taking a hard left line on just about everything, and doing everything she can to make her own country look bad. I would examine anything she says with special care.

6 posted on 04/27/2007 6:21:35 PM PDT by AnAmericanMother ((Ministrix of Ye Chase, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: AnAmericanMother
In Mother Theresa's case, we could be confident that she was telling the truth, even if we happened to disagree with her.

Reread your own sentence - it is absurd.

Of course if one is not capable to evaluate what is being said or written one is doomed to to rely on personal trust.

Machiavelli stated:

"Three minds exist; one capable of thinking for itself; another able to understand others' thinking's; and a third that can do neither. The first mind is of the highest excellence, the second excellent, and the third worthless."

11 posted on 04/27/2007 6:33:54 PM PDT by A. Pole (Aeschylus "Memory is the mother of all wisdom.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson