Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wideawake
A fairer solution would be to treat the owner of a pit bull, in law, as if he personally committed any violent act the pit bull committed.

The problem with this is that it's hard to convict if there isn't criminal intent. It would be hard to argue that merely owning a pit bull constitutes criminal intent unless the breed was illegal to own.

I think a good solution would be to require that all pit bulls be neutered before transfer or sale & outlaw commercial breeding of the dog. The breed would disappear naturally.

49 posted on 04/27/2007 11:17:25 AM PDT by BearCub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: BearCub

“I think a good solution would be to require that all pit bulls be neutered before transfer or sale & outlaw commercial breeding of the dog. The breed would disappear naturally.”

That’s a tough one though... There are several varieties of “pit” type dogs. Which one’s, and how mixed, to require mandatory altering? And what about the Corso’s (talk about a scary breed!) and the many other bull/pit type dogs? Would they fall into the same category? I’m all for taking large dangerous animals out of the hands of the irresponsible, but how are we going to ban a “breed” that is composed of so many breeds? It’s not a realistic solution IMHO.


55 posted on 04/27/2007 11:23:12 AM PDT by dha (The safest place to be is within the will of God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: BearCub

Not criminal INTENT, but criminal NEGLECT!


110 posted on 04/27/2007 12:36:45 PM PDT by Don W ("Well Done" is far better to hear than "Well Said". (Samuel Clemens))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson