This Electronic Briefing Book includes a comprehensive listing of available records relating to U.S. interrogation policies, including records officially released by the White House and the Department of Defense on June 22, leaked documents that have not been officially released, and a description of 17 records that have not been made available to the public. In addition, this posting includes the text of a congressional subpoena proposed by Senators Leahy and Feinstein that was defeated on June 17, 2004 by the Senate Judiciary Committee and a copy of the "Taguba Report" detailing the findings of a Department of Defense investigation into the treatment of prisoners at Abu Ghraib Prison in Iraq.
The website is George Washington University. My uneducated guess would be that the vast majority of poly-sci profs from that campus that would be into this thing would most likely be liberal, and have an axe to grind. IOW, I don't really give the source a lot of credit for being completely truthful. That's just me though - I am VERY hard to convince that our military is in the wrong. :-)
And hence my use of the word “alledgedly.”
We have a real problem with source. The accusers won’t believe anything from the government says and conservatives have correctly come to expect bias from the media.
that larger problem looks unresolvable.
I’ve got a lot of concern about Haditha (not the least of which is confusion by the public with other cases) - I just hope their lawyers are able to show they should be found not-guilty rather than trying to back the administration into a corner on interrogation.
I am the same way!
I don't like the idea that anyone gets any benefit, in accusing our military of anything wrong...........without absolute proof.
Then again....I'm not sure I would believe it then either.