Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TexConfederate1861
According to the code, you only challenge your social equal. Sumner didn’t qualify.

Then why haul out the Code Duello to begin with? Sumner came from a prominent family, was educated at Boston Latin, Harvard, and Harvard law, and was fluent in several languages. Brooks was a wastrel, an unsuccessful duelist, and a mediocre politician. Sumner's intellect and sophistication put Brooks to shame. Brooks was the low-life, not Sumner. He beat an older, unarmed man almost to death, depending on he fellow lunatic, Lawrence Keitt, to hold off any interference with a pistol. Hardly the acts of gentlemen. More like street-level thugs.

In the end I suppose Sumner had his revenge. Brooks went on to his early and unlamented death in 1857. His victim lived for almost 20 more years and died a respected man. Brooks was planted in some foresaken spot, God knows where. Sumner was was awarded the honor of lying in state in the Capitol before burial at Mount Auburn in Massachusetts. Brooks is a trivia question and Sumner's memory lives on in the number of counties and people who were named after him.

300 posted on 05/02/2007 5:29:39 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur

What amazes me about you gentleman, is that you go on about Brooks being a thug. He probably was. However, you seem to overlook that Sumner made a very inflammatory and insulting speech. Free Speech isn’t without it’s consequences. Brooks was not atypical of most Southerners, but his family was insulted, and I have seen people KILLED in the North for less!

I am not convinced that he meant to do anything other than give the guy a good beating anyway. I think his temper got the best of him.


301 posted on 05/02/2007 5:48:06 AM PDT by TexConfederate1861 (Surrender means that the history of this heroic struggle will be written by the enemy.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies ]

To: Non-Sequitur

Here is a “neutral” version of the beating:

On May 22, 1856, Brooks beat Senator Charles Sumner with his Gutta-percha wood walking cane in the Senate chamber because of a speech Sumner had made three days previous criticizing President Franklin Pierce and Southerners who sympathized with the pro-slavery violence in Kansas (”Bleeding Kansas”). In particular, Sumner lambasted Brooks’ kinsman, Senator Andrew Butler, who was not in attendance when the speech was read, describing slavery as a harlot, comparing Butler with Don Quixote for embracing it, and mocking Butler for a physical handicap. Senator Stephen Douglas of Illinois, who was also a subject of abuse during the speech, suggested to a colleague while Sumner was orating that “this damn fool [Sumner] is going to get himself shot by some other damn fool.” (Jordan et. al The Americans)

At first intending to challenge Sumner to a duel, Brooks consulted with fellow South Carolina Rep. Laurence M. Keitt on dueling etiquette. Keitt instructed him that dueling was for gentlemen of equal social standing, and suggested that Sumner occupied a lower social status comparable to a drunkard due to the supposedly coarse language he had used during his speech. Brooks thus decided to attack Sumner with a cane.

Two days after the speech, on the afternoon of May 22, Brooks confronted Sumner as he sat writing at his desk in the almost empty Senate chamber. Brooks was accompanied by Laurence M. Keitt, also of South Carolina, and Henry A. Edmundson of Virginia. Brooks said, “Mr. Sumner, I have read your speech twice over carefully. It is a libel on South Carolina, and Mr. Butler, who is a relative of mine.” As Sumner began to stand up, Brooks began beating Sumner on the head with his thick gutta-percha cane with a gold head. Sumner was trapped under the heavy desk (which was bolted to the floor), but Brooks continued to bash Sumner until he ripped the desk from the floor. By this time, Sumner was blinded by his own blood, and he staggered up the aisle and collapsed, lapsing into unconsciousness. Brooks continued to beat Sumner until he broke his cane, then quietly left the chamber. Several other senators attempted to help Sumner, but were blocked by Keitt who was holding a pistol and shouting “Let them be!”

South Carolinians sent Brooks dozens of brand new canes to replace the one he had broken. The Richmond Enquirer crowed: “We consider the act good in conception, better in execution, and best of all in consequences. These vulgar abolitionists in the Senate must be lashed into submission.”

Brooks survived an expulsion vote in the House but resigned his seat, claiming both that he “meant no disrespect to the Senate of the United States” by attacking Sumner and that he did not intend to kill him, for he would have used a different weapon if he had. His constituents thought of him as a hero and returned him to Congress. Brooks remained in office until his death from the croup in 1857 and is buried in Edgefield, South Carolina. Sumner was unable to return to duty for more than three years while he recovered. He later became one of the most influential Radical Republicans throughout the conduct of the American Civil War, and on through the early years of Reconstruction.


302 posted on 05/02/2007 5:55:18 AM PDT by TexConfederate1861 (Surrender means that the history of this heroic struggle will be written by the enemy.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson