Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TexConfederate1861
Don’t think for a minute that we are’t STILL capable.
Especially where our rights and liberties are concerned.

I have no doubt. But this wasn't about your rights or liberties. It was about an insult. Do you really believe that the way to deal with an insult is to come up to an unprepared opponent sitting at a desk and beat him with a gold-headed cane until the cane breaks? If Sumner had died, would you have called it murder, or honor avenged?


283 posted on 05/01/2007 10:30:06 AM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("i'm wrong about many things"--stand watie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies ]


To: Bubba Ho-Tep

Sumner provoked his beating. His speech was extremely insulting to the gentleman in question. Under the Code Duello, in use at the time, Preston Brooks was entitled to beat him, but I personally believe that it was a bit excessive. The times being what they were, with members of Congress on BOTH sides pulling pistols, this wasn’t extreme.

Sam Houston beat Congressman Stanberry years earlier, over a speech as well.


285 posted on 05/01/2007 11:34:24 AM PDT by TexConfederate1861 (Surrender means that the history of this heroic struggle will be written by the enemy.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson