Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GovernmentShrinker
As for the squeegee men, a lot of them were threatening and a few carried out threats. Intimidating motorists while they’re stuck in traffic at stop lights, by approaching and touching their cars without permission or invitation, is not something that should be tolerated. It’s not something that’s safe for city drivers to get accustomed to.

Pity the drivers there aren't allowed to carry the means of more directly causing such folk to reassess their modus operandi...here, looking down the barrel of a .45 might cause them to rethink their profession.

No need to look to the government for salvation.

Therein, though, lies the crux of the matter. Many city folks wouldn't tolerate such independance, and we refuse to live without it.

268 posted on 04/25/2007 3:54:41 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]


To: Smokin' Joe

Much as I agree with the principle of armed self-defense, the reality is that these squeegee men were operating in heavy traffic, at stop lights. Firing a gun at a squeegee man in that setting would be extremely likely to end up hitting an innocent occupant of another car, or a pedestrian.


270 posted on 04/25/2007 8:01:32 AM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson