Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mamelukesabre
So he reasons that cho’s accessibility to handguns may have actually saved lives since he would have potentially killed more with a bomb.

Keep working on him, maybe he'll realize that returning fire with equal deadly force is the only thing that would stop a maniac like Cho..

Even the gun control types are finally realizing that the feel-good laws they helped put in place are just as responsible for mass death and destruction as the weapons used.

Look, we've tried it their way for years, and guess what? Criminals bent on murder could give a rat's patoot about gun control laws. What a hard lesson for those liberals to learn.

90 posted on 04/22/2007 1:57:27 PM PDT by pray4liberty (http://totallyunjust.tripod.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: pray4liberty

Yep.

He came to the conclusion that we should ban guns but allow rubber bullet guns. I had to inform him that rubber bullets are fired from real guns and they kill at close range.

Then he said “tasers”.

So I told him that tasers are favorites for kidnappers and date rapists because there is no material evidence left behind after discharging one.

He had no comeback after that except “I don’t know then”.

Do you know if there is even a background check required to purchase a taser?


96 posted on 04/22/2007 4:17:11 PM PDT by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson