Brawling on FR? I’m shocked. Shocked I tell you.
The problem is, Rudy is totally and completely unacceptable. It’s not just one conservative against another, he’s a far left liberal activist against our core conservative values. After the pro-life, pro family GWB, Giuliani is a shock to our senses. In regards to our core values, he’s the exact same animal as Hillary only he wears a dress. It’s a deep stinging insult that he would be considered at all as presidential material for the GOP.
There’s no other way I can say it. Our unalienable rights to life and Liberty are not negotiable and not up for compromise or debate.
And your side should not be so quick to claim purity and innocence, by the way. I see some of you fighting like howling banshees every day on FR. And it’s not new. Some of the dearly departed have fought like howling banshees since arriving on FR many years ago.
Brawling on FR? I’m shocked. Shocked I tell you.
“Brawling on FR? I’m shocked. Shocked I tell you.”
LOL! Its good to see you havent lost your sense of humor
during this.
OK - I’ve said my piece.
Honestly, I wish the primary was tomorrow so this whole nasty period of infighting could be behind us. It’s way too early for this.
ROFL. Jim, can I steal that for a tagline? Please?
Brawling on FR? I’m shocked. Shocked I tell you.
I love what you two have done for this country, and most of the time we're on the same page.
But I don't agree with that opinion, and it's not getting any more traction with me through repetition.
I was brought up in NYC and I lived there during the worst of times.
It is inconceivable that if, by magic, HRC had succeeded David Dinkins in 1993 the incredible transformation of my city that took place from 1993-2001 would have occurred.
In fact, I'm quite sure that the rate of deterioration would have accelerated.
I am persuadeable that Rudy cannot be elected because his nomination would split the party, but the snapping and snarling we're seeing here haven't convinced me of that - yet.
And, without naming any names, the track record of Republican elected officials on abortion - not what they say, but what they do - has been fair to poor. That's because, IMO, they have to get elected, and the electorate's position on abortion is, "against it, but...".
I don't believe a candidate who is against it, and has an action plan that goes beyond getting Roe reversed can be even nominated, much less elected, without a moral change in the country first.
And, on top of that, someone who can be painted as running for President to initiate or to force that moral change can't be nominated or elected, either.
Moral change is something to pray for. Running the apparatus of government is something to vote for.
And, just in case this is post 10 000, here's a flag.
