Are you of the position that once a female is pregnant, all choice regarding that pregnancy is off limits and it must be carried to term as it is. Even in the event of a technological advance that sees no loss of life?
I ask you this because that is the impression you give me with your posts. If that is the case, so be it. But then you have to admit that your opposition to abortion is not about preservation of life, you have to admit that it lies with your desire to force that pregnancy to term where it began.
Much is said to me on this thread about being truthful. I am very much doing that very thing. You should join me.
It's 2017, and the medical field has developed a method for transplanting an unborn child from one woman's womb into another's. Yet we have a woman who simply wants to abort her child instead of transplanting it. Should she be allowed to do so?
Your argument is more full of holes than swiss cheese. Even if such a transfer could be done (and it is highly doubtful, you are talking moving massive blood supplies, etc), there is currently no medical procedure that is 100% without risk, nor is there likely to be any time in the forseeable future.
Therefore you would be risking the child, the biological mother and the host mother to preform a procedure that would be mitigated by carrying the baby to term in its original host. Besides that, you proposal is morally and ethically repulsive, and I don’t mind saying it.
“Are you of the position that once a female is pregnant, all choice regarding that pregnancy is off limits and it must be carried to term as it is. Even in the event of a technological advance that sees no loss of life?”
YES!
It was her CHOICE to play around and become pregnant and it’s her RESPONSIBILITY to make sure the life she started is taken care of.
NOT someone else.
“Much is said to me on this thread about being truthful. I am very much doing that very thing. You should join me.”
I’ve said it repeatedly in my posts where I stand.
You just refuse to listen because you think your nonsense is ‘sensible’.
It’s NOT!