Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Diamond
Can you please explain to me how "a pregnancy can be removed from a female" "without ending the pregnancy itself"?

Similar to the way an organ is removed and implanted in another. Science and technology would have to make advances in this area as has been done up to this point to allow us to do what we do today.

You repeat mindless euphemisms and slogans, even to the point of making literally nonsense statements. Why?

Please do be specific with the so called slogans and nonsense statements. I will address them as you do so.

I call an unborn baby what it is truhfully...an unborn baby. There is something wrong with abortion, which is exactly why I seek to find another route. I guess that is beyond you. Please see that just removing choice because something is wrong doesn't solve everything, it only creates other problems. Like slippery slopes.

The liberal left points out what they feel is wrong all the time. Gun bans, Smoking bans, seat belts, helmets, etc etc etc. Their answer is just to ban something without any other solutions or choices. That tactic is opposed on this website and others as improper all the time. And rightly so.

I believe what sets a conservative apart from the liberal leftist is the ability to seek out solutions that solve problems, address wrongs, without using an adittional wrong to do it. That is what the left does and I want no part of such a tactic.

I do not believe that just banning everthing has to be the answer, as stated, I believe what needs to be done is find an alternative choice that can reflect and respect solutions to the oppositions on all sides of this subject.

Are you against such a notion?
8,531 posted on 04/25/2007 7:01:13 AM PDT by Just sayin (Is is what it is, for if it was anything else, it would be isn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4951 | View Replies ]


To: Just sayin
You repeat mindless euphemisms and slogans, even to the point of making literally nonsense statements.

The only one talking nonsense is you.

8,532 posted on 04/25/2007 7:05:22 AM PDT by Elyse (I refuse to feed the crocodile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8531 | View Replies ]

To: Just sayin
You repeat mindless euphemisms and slogans, even to the point of making literally nonsense statements. Why?

Gee, because you are addressing one of the great moral issues of our time with science fiction that has no bearing on the current debate? Not only that, but Brave New World was meant as a warning, not as a guide for a better life in the future.

8,539 posted on 04/25/2007 7:12:48 AM PDT by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08/But Fred would also be great)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8531 | View Replies ]

To: Just sayin
Thank you for your reply. Please do be specific with the so called slogans and nonsense statements. I will address them as you do so.

"Terminating a pregnancy" is one such mindless slogan that I addressed in my post to you, which is a little bit like the nonsensical statement that "a pregnancy can be removed from a female without ending the pregnancy itself". Maybe it's just bad writing, but an unborn baby is not merely a "pregnancy". An unborn baby is a separate human being who temporarily relies on his or her mother for life support. An pre natal infant is not some sort of disease or mere appendage of a mother's body.

The liberal left points out what they feel is wrong all the time. Gun bans, Smoking bans, seat belts, helmets, etc etc etc. Their answer is just to ban something without any other solutions or choices. That tactic is opposed on this website and others as improper all the time. And rightly so.

"Choice" is another one of those mindless slogans. It is a subject without a predicate. It is meaningless. Choice to do what?

Suppose I said to you, "There is something wrong with slavery, which is exactly why I seek to find another route. I guess that is beyond you. Please see that just removing choice because something is wrong doesn't solve everything, it only creates other problems. Like slippery slopes."

By what principle could you reject that statement? If you were consistent, you couldn't. You leave yourself no principled reason to reject it because "choice" by itself, being devoid of meaning, forces you to violate your own standard if you do reject something like slavery because you would be "removing choice" from slaveowners who choose to own slaves.

You are on the beginning of the right track by calling an unborn baby what it is truhfully...an unborn baby. You would do well to speak as directly and truthfully when it comes to what an abortionist actually does who cuts off the limbs and crushes the skulls of unborn babies, burns them alive with chemicals, or throws them in a pan to die after they are born; not exactly on par with smoking bans, seat belts, helmets kinds of things.

"Potential life" is another one of those idiotic, oxymoronic catch-phrases that has no basis in reality. But don't get me started on that one.

Cordially,

8,655 posted on 04/25/2007 9:06:35 AM PDT by Diamond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8531 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson