[NittanyLion]

If abortion is just banned then the unborn’s rights are observed and the female who is pregnant has hers ignored. If it is allowed to continue as is then the unborn’s rights are ignored. I find both of these situations to be wrong, per the constitutionally recognized rights of the individual, which is why I seek another alternative. That is how I feel about this very minute.

That's nothing more than a copout. I "seek" world peace, but that doesn't absolve me from taking a stand on the issues of the day such as the War on Terror.

This really isn't that difficult. Do you support the repeal of Roe v Wade? And if so, do you support state bans on abortion?

[Just sayin]

Sorry you think that equality is a copout. Laws are repealed, judgements are overturned. What ROE is, simply put, was judicial activism and the WRONG way to go about law making. Many times it is SCOUTS who punts, in this example I think Congress punted.

I thought I answered such a question on this thread already?

Multiple Congress’ allowed something to go forward that was beyond the scope of the Judicial branch of government and should have addressed it in LAW long ago. They could do so today.....if they were forced to actually do their jobs.

I don’t generally support outright bans, per se, because that precident is easily and often abused. I prefer alternative choices that accomplish the goals that are desired by all parties concerned. That principle is what brought me to the position I hold today.