Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bigh4u2

HYSTERECTOMY! You holler.

So you are saying then that a female has to forgo having any more children anytime in the future? Let me ask you this, do women today have children years after they have an abortion? You bet they do, and you just said that you would stop that from happening. Think about that a minute. Please.

If you support that choice, why would you not support an additional one of a similar nature?

It occurs to me that you just seek to make all the rules on your terms and are not open to any kind of alternative solution. Strikes me as a Sheryl Crow moment...one square.


8,514 posted on 04/25/2007 6:25:21 AM PDT by Just sayin (Is is what it is, for if it was anything else, it would be isn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4890 | View Replies ]


To: Just sayin

I have no problem with saying if you kill one child you have no right to any further children


8,516 posted on 04/25/2007 6:27:29 AM PDT by Mom MD (The scorn of fools is music to the ears of the wise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8514 | View Replies ]

To: Just sayin

You’re starting from a false premise to begin with.

So you think it’s ok to be promiscuous as long as there are no disadvantages brought on some women through responsibility for theirs actions.

Just sleep around with anyone they want and , “oh, I’m pregnant. Time to get rid of the little PARASITE, so I can have more fun!”.

If women want to have children in the future, then maybe they should consider what they are doing in the present before playing the VICTIM.

The VICTIM is the ‘non viable mass’ they so casually dispose of.


8,519 posted on 04/25/2007 6:39:44 AM PDT by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8514 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson