Another thread which is typical of JimRob’s thoughts about George W. Bush at the time:
George Bush Covers-up for Clinton and China [Free Republic]
http://web.archive.org/web/20031223205352/http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a38123a4375fc.htm
A Bush presidency will be very dangerous for America.
30 Posted on 10/23/1999 18:02:42 PDT by Jim Robinson (jimrob@psnw.com)
Bush II is simply another term for Bush I. No thanks. Been there, done that.
58 Posted on 10/23/1999 19:08:02 PDT by Jim Robinson (jimrob@psnw.com)
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | Top | Last ]
By the way, I must’ve missed the years that Reagan’s father was President of the USA. Also, I hardly believe that GW’s experience sitting on the boards of ailing oil companies (as favors granted his powerful father) and collecting big bucks is the best experience (from a constituent’s point of view) for becoming Governor or President. Nor do I believe the experience he gained by misusing tax dollars for private (the stadium deal) gain is a shining beacon of trust. From my point of view all I see is a powerful daddy pulling in markers from his rich and influential friends. And there aint no way you’ll ever convince me that Bush is even one/tenth the statesman or conservative that Reagan was. There is NO comparison.
63 Posted on 10/23/1999 19:17:23 PDT by Jim Robinson (jimrob@psnw.com)
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | Top | Last ]
Bush scares the bejeebies outta me. Looks like his father got us into this mess and Clinton stepped it up. Now Bush II comes in to finish the job. Guess we’ll all be speaking Chinese soon, or not at all.
88 Posted on 10/23/1999 20:09:33 PDT by Jim Robinson (jimrob@psnw.com)
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | Top | Last ]
Yup. Bush II is simply a continuation of the failed Bush I.
92 Posted on 10/23/1999 20:29:07 PDT by Jim Robinson (jimrob@psnw.com)
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | Top | Last ]
Mojo, are you attempting seppuku?
Are you getting prepared to opus and the articles you've been posting is your way of leading to it?
I don’t see anything particularly wrong in that post. If true, he was having a bad day in the other post. I still support him because he is anti-abortion. He has never killed an unborn baby. He tries to save them. Where is the crime in Gods eyes? His words, or an abortion doctor killing an innocent baby?
I think Keyes would have been a disaster as President, but while I’m glad Bush was elected, a lot of the complaints about him in those threads have kind of been born out.
Kind of scary in fact. Other than the “cokehead” argument, it’s pretty sound.
Oh well. I wasn’t around here in 2000.