Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mkjessup; Jim Robinson
You didn't like that, which is what triggered your premature exasperation.

As usual, you make an assumption and you do it constantly. I DID KNOW THAT and it wasn't premature.

As for whether or not I 'know' MThatcher, that isn't even germane to the subject at hand.

Sure it is. You told me I don't 'know' you so I couldn't make a comment about. So the same applies to you knowing her.

If you wish to defend the indefensible,

I would NEVER defend your posts.

MThatcher might invite you to high tea for your troubles.

Like I said, I don't communicate with her. It isn't necessarily about her. The same has been done to others. This is a 'stand on principle' thread - yet, name calling, slurs, sarcasm is paramount and it's given a free pass. That's hypocrisy, IMO. Your giddiness about when conservative long-time freepers leave willingly or otherwise is very telling.

I could care less that MT threatened you - but I hate to see Jim in the midst of anything because of your disruptive tactics.
7,440 posted on 04/24/2007 1:29:43 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7342 | View Replies ]


To: presently no screen name
I could care less that MT threatened you - but I hate to see Jim in the midst of anything because of your disruptive tactics.

M.Thatcher didn't just threaten mkjessup. She threatened Jim Robinson and Free Republic in general. She flipped out, after taking somewhat of a beating lately, and said that she would call the FBI and talk to her big shot media buddies to smear Free Republic. All because mkjessup posted an animated gif of a fictional character beating on a laser printer. M.Thatcher lost her sanity, as evidenced by her threats over something utterly inconsequential.

How about you get a damned clue about what you're talking about and give it a rest.

7,486 posted on 04/24/2007 1:43:20 PM PDT by Spiff (Rudy Giuliani Quote (NY Post, 1996) "Most of Clinton's policies are very similar to most of mine.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7440 | View Replies ]

To: presently no screen name; Jim Robinson; dmw
You didn't like that, which is what triggered your premature exasperation.
As usual, you make an assumption and you do it constantly. I DID KNOW THAT and it wasn't premature.


So you admit to being a bit exasperated eh? Have you tried the decaf?

As for whether or not I 'know' MThatcher, that isn't even germane to the subject at hand.
Sure it is. You told me I don't 'know' you so I couldn't make a comment about. So the same applies to you knowing her.


You're only half clever. You were trying to divine my spiritual state when you truly don't know anything about me at all. Whether or not I know MThatcher personally, or at all is NOT germane, as all I NEED to know is how she behaved last night, her prior outburst(s) at JimRob and anyone else that torqued her off, and when dmw called her a 'crazy liberal' he had plenty of basis for that, because she left FR as many of these crazy FRiberals do. Her behavior was not defensible and you know that too.

If you wish to defend the indefensible,
I would NEVER defend your posts.


Straw man sparky. You were not asked to defend my posts.

MThatcher might invite you to high tea for your troubles.
Like I said, I don't communicate with her. It isn't necessarily about her.


Yes it is, because you made MThatcher an issue when you started lecturing dmw on how he was characterizing her. Stick to the subject at hand.

The same has been done to others.

So we're talking about others now? I thought what set off your alarm bells was somebody referring to MThatcher as a 'crazy liberal'?

This is a 'stand on principle' thread - yet, name calling, slurs, sarcasm is paramount and it's given a free pass. That's hypocrisy, IMO.

No, it's not hypocrisy, it's called politics, and as the saying goes, 'politics ain't beanbag', it isn't governed by the Marquis of Queensbury rules, it is catch-as-catch-can, and if you're looking for examples of name calling, slurs, sarcasm, etc., where were you when FR was being swamped and spammed on a daily basis by these now departed RudyBots who p*ssed all over what this website stands for, and our host who makes it all possible? You're quick to lash out when things don't seem to rise to your own personal level of gentlemanly conduct, but what you are conveniently forgetting is that the REAL conservatives, the ones who haven't sold out to Rudy and his gun-grabbing, abortions-for-all, special-rights-for-homos agenda, did NOT START THIS!

But by God, and with JimRob, the true conservatives on this website will damn well *finish* it. If you can't handle that, that's your problem.

Your giddiness about when conservative long-time freepers leave willingly or otherwise is very telling.

When I see former FRiberals who have been exposed as liberal-RINO-scum exiting or being banished from this website, you better believe it puts me in a good mood. I've seen enough of this stealth-liberal horse manure being slung around, and like many Freepers, I was always wondering in the back of my mind just how much patience JimRob was going to show those faux-'conservatives', and now he's cleaning house, and I back that 100 percent.

FR is being cleansed of the liberal stench that had slipped in more or less unawares, and that is a very good thing, and I couldn't be happier about it.
7,511 posted on 04/24/2007 1:54:37 PM PDT by mkjessup (Jan 20, 2009 - "We Don't Know. Where Rudy Went. Just Glad He's Not. The President. Burma Shave.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7440 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson