Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cicero's_son
No has been banned for their convictions; they were banned for their dishonesty and incivility in promoting them.

Incivility. Hmmm.

Is that sort of like telling someone, "Up yours, asswipe," when all they've done is lay out a case for their candidate?

That outburst was unfortunate, but your premise is false because 'laying out a case for their candidate' was not 'all they had done'.

These threads have had many heated discussions and unfortunately there have been many excesses and instances of frustrated people on all sides 'losing their cool' throughout this and other related threads. And, as I pointed out, great latitude was given to this. It required the combination of both the incivility AND the dishonesty to reach the critical mass.

6,805 posted on 04/24/2007 9:43:47 AM PDT by tarheelswamprat (I love dialoging. It's a great way to pick up chicks! (*obscure cinema refence - all rights reserved)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6776 | View Replies ]


To: tarheelswamprat
It required the combination of both the incivility AND the dishonesty to reach the critical mass.

"Critical mass" came after 50 posts?

Please.

6,810 posted on 04/24/2007 9:46:45 AM PDT by cicero's_son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6805 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson