Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Just sayin

Removing a baby would be invasive abdominal surgery. Why would these women agree to that, if they can’t handle just being pregnant?


4,897 posted on 04/23/2007 10:34:14 AM PDT by Politicalmom (Better a democrat with an energized opposition than a leftist “Republican” with no opposition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4853 | View Replies ]


To: Politicalmom

I would offer to you that abortion as it stands today is pretty invasive as well. I read recenty about a gall bladder removal thru the uterus. That leads me to think such a choice would be made.

If abortion as it is today is not longer a choice, because something like what I offer is the alternative choice to the one they have today, I would say they make this choice or they bring the unborn baby to term. Choice remains and abortion as it is today is no more.


8,509 posted on 04/25/2007 6:13:53 AM PDT by Just sayin (Is is what it is, for if it was anything else, it would be isn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4897 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson