[LexBaird]

How can you say death of the child is the desired result? Why is it not that the desired result is just not to be pregnant? A life need not be taken to accomplish the “not be pregnant part” were we to advance science. Your premise may need to be revised.

Or yours does. For example, the partial birth abortions that are currently the center of the debate are the destruction of viable babies that could conceivably be nurtured in incubators. Their mothers are instead choosing to have them killed and dismembered to make the abortion easier and/or to save their precious figure from a caesarean scar.

[Bigh4u2]

“Their mothers are instead choosing to have them killed and dismembered to make the abortion easier and/or to save their precious figure from a caesarean scar.”

It’s more than that.

If the choice was only not to have a baby, then bring the baby to term and giving it up for adoption would be the logical result.

That’s not the case. The reason for ‘late term’ abortion is ‘control’ by feminists over ‘their bodies’ and ‘no baby is going to stop that’.

Like I said before. There ARE choices. But abortion is the only one they choose.

[Just sayin]

I am quite happy to see an end to partial birth abortion.