[presently no screen name]

We all know there are freepers who won’t vote for Rudy, even if it means Hillary will be elected......I just asked for the freepers who actually said they would VOTE for Hillary.

A default vote is a vote for her. Stay at home/3rd party voters - standing on principle - is a 'could care less who gets in' attitude. They want someone else to pick up the slack while they self righteously cover themself in 'their principles' to prove a point. Add that to voter fraud and you get your heart's desire, hillary. Then FR can close down - for all the good they did in the past - they got zotted at their own game.

[Chuck Dent]

Then FR can close down - for all the good they did in the past - they got zotted at their own game.

FR is an good sounding board & excellent forum in which to exercise political debate, but it has no influence on actual politics and/or policy at any level, whether it be local, state or national.

I'm in complete agreement with the criticisms leveled at Rudy & Arnie. Rudy's lack of understanding of what the 2A really means is disturbing, as his lack of appreciation of why family foundation is critical to society's long-term stability.

Yet, at the end of the day, I'll be there pulling the R lever regardless of whose name is there, because quite simply, I can't stand democrats.

[do the dhue]

We won't have to surrender our values like a friendly Frenchman, if someone like Fred can get in and motivate the Conservative base. You will see. Rudy won't win. Hillary may not even win.

The media is trying to tell you who you should vote for. Relax, lets talk about the issues and let people vote for who they believe in. In most cases, we will all get behind that person.

Do we have to start listening to the NY Times all the sudden? If you do, you will start to hyperventilate.

[CharlesWayneCT]

You missed the genesis of the discussion. We weren’t actually talking about the serious issue you raise. A poster said there were freepers who actually said “they would vote for hillary”, and I just asked for links to where they said it.

And there have been no links provided yet. It had nothing to do with interpreting actions as support, it was about a specific claim and verifying that specific claim.

During the attempt to prove that claim, we found a freeper who said he’d give Hillary money. But that freeper never said he’d vote for her.