Bull - regarding this particular dustup over hotlinking, she picked the fight. See post 17,212 for the starting point and follow it. Realize two posts got yanked - the first where she posted a graphic saying EV was stealing, and another where EV caugh her with a copyrighted photo on her own website, and NN, rather than saying "yeah, I did wrong", changed the linked object TO THE EV ATTACK GRAPHIC.
And then NN admitted it wasn't the hotlinking, but the content of the hotlinking that she didn't like.
Take a reading comprehension course. I only noticed all those graphics were hotlinked because of the absolute quantity, followed by the their unseemly context. I simply asked whether EV owns all of those sites out of curiosity. Nothing more, nothing less.
EV's denial that hotlinking graphics from another's website is theft was the biggest eye opener, particularly in light of the holier-than-thou religious taunts in so many of posts.
Please stop trying to divine my intentions. You haven't completed your Mind Reading 101 class yet.