Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: The Spirit Of Allegiance; All
Rudy isn’t even the GOP CANDIDATE yet.
It’s entirely one issue to consider voting for Rudy in the Catch-22 horror of IF a year-and-a-half from now he’s the GOP candidate.
But supporting Rudy NOW is acting as knowing accessory before the fact, so to speak, in furthering his Liberal agenda.


TSOA, that is about as concise as it gets. Great post.

It is no secret that Giuliani is a pro-abortionist who up until his conveeeeeenient flip-flop on partial-birth-abortion in the wake of the SCOTUS decision banning it, has always described himself as a 'pro-choice' (i.e. pro-infanticide) Republican, embraces the views of Margaret Sanger, receives political donations from NARAL, states that federal funding should be provided for women who can't afford to murder their children on a limited budget.

Any and every person who signs on and supports Giuliani is, if not endorsing, condoning his murderous views on the sanctity of human life.

There is no escaping that fact. You said it well TSOA, such people are 'accessories before the fact'.
15,955 posted on 04/30/2007 5:51:45 AM PDT by mkjessup (Jan 20, 2009 - "We Don't Know. Where Rudy Went. Just Glad He's Not. The President. Burma Shave.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15777 | View Replies ]


To: mkjessup

Whoo hoo! Caught up!


15,957 posted on 04/30/2007 5:53:42 AM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15955 | View Replies ]

To: mkjessup

“Any and every person who signs on and supports Giuliani is, if not endorsing, condoning his murderous views on the sanctity of human life.

There is no escaping that fact.”

Yes there is. You just have to try and think a little bit.

If my choice for President is between TWO pro-choice candidates (Rudy and Hillary), and sitting out the election would simply hand it over to Her Highness, IT DOESN’T MATTER what I, personally, think of abortion (which, by the way, I’m completely against), because there’s NO ONE in there representing my viewpoint, and I’m going to get screwed on that issue NO MATTER WHAT.

Now, follow this - you might not agree, but follow this...

Given the above, I DO think Rudy’s shown leadership ability, I respect his forthrightness, and I’ve heard him say he’ll nominate strict constructionist judges. In comparison, there isn’t ANYTHING about Her Highness I respect. I think she’s an evil, scheming Socialist (not to mention screeching) RAT, and it would be hellish to have her — not to mention Bill — back in Washington again.

Therefore, in an election between the two, I would support Giuilani in a HEARTBEAT - but, in doing so, I am NOT endorsing “or condoning his murderous views on the santity of human life.” — I am merely putting up with them, because in the event he’s the candidate, I’d have no choice.


15,991 posted on 04/30/2007 6:59:57 AM PDT by Pravious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15955 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson