[Rb ver. 2.0]

In so much as it’s intent wasn’t applied by it’s founders(creators, writers) in regard to the exclusion of the black man, then yes it was a fraudulent statement.

Had the black man not been excluded then the statement would be 100% correct at it’s time of origin.

Please feel free to correct my grammar and spelling, I know that empowers you.

[EternalVigilance]

In so much as it’s intent wasn’t applied by it’s founders(creators, writers) in regard to the exclusion of the black man, then yes it was a fraudulent statement.

Well, that's a step back towards sanity.