Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dog Gone
I always felt we could handle civil disagreements without demanding a ban.

Therein lies the problem. The incivility became awful; my guess is that Jim decided he had to put a stop to it. Since both sides were equally guilty, all else equal if you must pick one to ban you're going with the more liberal one.

15,028 posted on 04/29/2007 1:15:14 PM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15022 | View Replies ]


To: NittanyLion

I totally disagree. We had a spirited debate about the candidates.

Which should be a good thing.

It was a bit early, starting in February of 2007, but what the heck, Freepers look ahead.

We still haven’t had a Republican candidate debate and it’s now April.

The incivility began when it was made plain here that you can’t support a particular candidate. I’m not sure you can even be undecided at this time about that candidate.

It’s not quite that cut and dried, but the message is unmistakeable, and the lunatics running around trying to get people who have been members here for nine or ten years is utterly disgusting.

Well, guys, it worked. High fives all around!

Now what?

Indeed.


15,039 posted on 04/29/2007 1:24:41 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15028 | View Replies ]

To: NittanyLion

“The incivility became awful; my guess is that Jim decided he had to put a stop to it.”

Calling someone an asswipe isn’t a particularly good way to go about that.


15,072 posted on 04/29/2007 2:02:25 PM PDT by Pravious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15028 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson