Well, that seems reasonable enough.
Maybe we're not as far apart as it might have seemed.
But I do reserve the right to have a favorite not exactly in the race.
Reagan dead would be a better president than any Dim alive.
“What onus?”
Sorry for being short. Talking about dividing the Party as it relates to being here...the people dividing are the liberals or people supporting the liberal candidate. It seems pretty clear this is a conservative site, so the onus shouldn’t be on the conservatives. Now if it were some liberal site the opposite would be true.
Well, that seems reasonable enough.
Maybe we're not as far apart as it might have seemed.
But I do reserve the right to have a favorite not exactly in the race.
Reagan dead would be a better president than any Dim alive.
I think they are all conservatives. I concede that Rudy is a "liberal," but I think the Rudy folks that were on FR were conservatives, I believe they proved it over time. I won't agree that they should not argue strenuously and freeper-like (which can be kind of tough) on behalf of their candidate, since he is the leading contender for the conservative party in America, the GOP, if that's what is meant by being divisive. I will agree that the onus is on them to prove that Rudy is a conservative.