Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Blackirish
We got Bush as the nominee in 2000 because he was the "anointed one." He was selected by the PTB (whoever the hell they are) and proclaimed “frontrunner” and de facto nominee by the media and all pundits before anyone else could even get out of the starting gates. He was ramrodded through over the objections from the grassroots. Kind similar to what’s going on now, but it’s even starting earlier.
1,318 posted on 04/22/2007 12:08:22 AM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1280 | View Replies ]


To: Jim Robinson

Who should have rightly been the nominee in 2000?


1,323 posted on 04/22/2007 12:09:39 AM PDT by Rex Anderson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1318 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
We got Bush as the nominee in 2000 because he was the "anointed one." He was selected by the PTB (whoever the hell they are) and proclaimed “frontrunner” and de facto nominee by the media and all pundits before anyone else could even get out of the starting gates. He was ramrodded through over the objections from the grassroots. Kind similar to what’s going on now, but it’s even starting earlier.

Same thing with Dole in '96.

1,324 posted on 04/22/2007 12:09:50 AM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1318 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
We got Bush as the nominee in 2000 because he was the "anointed one." He was selected by the PTB (whoever the hell they are) and proclaimed “frontrunner” and de facto nominee by the media and all pundits before anyone else could even get out of the starting gates. He was ramrodded through over the objections from the grassroots. Kind similar to what’s going on now, but it’s even starting earlier.

Bush won the primaries. This notion that nominees are forced on anyone is tinfoil. Same tinfoil that's going on now regarding Giuliani. If you don't want Giuliani, field a candidate who can garner more votes.

1,329 posted on 04/22/2007 12:11:16 AM PDT by M. Thatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1318 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

Jim,

I hope most folks remember this:

“We got Bush as the nominee in 2000 because he was the “anointed one.” He was selected by the PTB (whoever the hell they are) and proclaimed “frontrunner” and de facto nominee by the media and all pundits before anyone else could even get out of the starting gates. He was ramrodded through over the objections from the grassroots.”

I know some will argue with you, but that is what happened. I hope it doesn’t happen again.


1,404 posted on 04/22/2007 12:29:33 AM PDT by OwenKellogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1318 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
We got Bush as the nominee in 2000 because he was the "anointed one." He was selected by the PTB (whoever the hell they are)... He was ramrodded through over the objections from the grassroots. Kind similar to what’s going on now, but it’s even starting earlier.

This is true, but the only challengers were MCCain and Buchanan. The basic problem of being anti rudy and anti mccain now is who is the challenger ?

1,944 posted on 04/22/2007 8:57:33 AM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1318 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
We got Bush as the nominee in 2000 because he was the "anointed one." He was selected by the PTB (whoever the hell they are) and proclaimed “frontrunner” and de facto nominee by the media and all pundits before anyone else could even get out of the starting gates. He was ramrodded through over the objections from the grassroots. Kind similar to what’s going on now, but it’s even starting earlier.

Exactly. And that makes me think there are too many liberals among the PTB. Way too cozy. IMO, it's the almighty $ (or whatever symbol the globalists will ultimately choose to represent their income from the peons).

2,462 posted on 04/22/2007 12:26:07 PM PDT by arasina (So there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1318 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

We got Bush as the nominee in 2000 because he was the “anointed one.” He was selected by the PTB (whoever the hell they are) and proclaimed “frontrunner” and de facto nominee by the media and all pundits before anyone else could even get out of the starting gates. He was ramrodded through over the objections from the grassroots. Kind similar to what’s going on now, but it’s even starting earlier.
= = =

That’s been my assessment, too. Glad I’m not the only one who saw things/sees things that way.


3,248 posted on 04/22/2007 5:15:18 PM PDT by Quix (GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1318 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

We got Bush as the nominee in 2000 because he was the “anointed one.” He was selected by the PTB (whoever the hell they are) and proclaimed “frontrunner” and de facto nominee by the media and all pundits before anyone else could even get out of the starting gates. He was ramrodded through over the objections from the grassroots. Kind similar to what’s going on now, but it’s even starting earlier.


I am so glad to see this posted by you....i haven’t forgotten how he was annointed...it seems like many on FR either aren’t aware of it or choose to ignore it.


13,087 posted on 04/28/2007 10:38:06 AM PDT by chasio649
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1318 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson