“yeah, in the way that Pol Pot was a better choice than Mao”
Huh? That’s dumb.
True it is dumb. The Irony is that it is dumb in equivalently the same way. Pol pot may not have killed as many people in his rule, or reigned as long as Mao, but he had similar - if less successful ambitions and values. Pol Pot was Mao lite, and if you think that pol pot killed a greater Percentage of Cambodians than Mao did the Chinese, I suggest you look at the numbers by province, and then compare provincial size to Cambodia.
Just As I would support neither of those leaders to head any nation, even if I was guaranteed to fail in my opposition, I wont support Rudy or Hillary. Both are evil. You can do what you want.