Will FR embrace socialism to make way for Rudy Giuliani as a Republican presidential candidate?

vanity | April 21, 2007 | Jim Robinson

[Enosh]

WooHoo! Flamingo!

[rbmillerjr]

“I didn’t just fall off the turnip truck. ;)”

They have turnips and trucks in Alaska. I didn’t know you were Alaskan. So my Maryland Blue Crab bet offer was quite coincidental. I like my tasty Blues better than the Kings. Size does not matter lol.

[JustaDumbBlonde]

"Politics aside, those are some good people. ;^("

Maybe so, but they were ... shall we say ... not so nice on this thread. I expected better.

[Knitting A Conundrum]

But I got 12,000 by accident!

[right way right]

Meany!

[Moose4]

Good morning placeholder ping-type thing. Or something.

}:-)4

[Knitting A Conundrum]

Rudy and Hillary...twin peas in a pod...

[Elyse]

Well, I thought my super scientific guys comment was dripping with enough sarcasm, but I guess next time I’ll have to add more. :)

[Maximus of Texas]

This thread is moving so fast it is hard to keep up but I do have one question because I haven't seen an answer yet (although I may have missed it). I have seen several posts regarding the forum's leadership not supporting Bush in 2001 and have personally witnessed the flaming/banning on anyone not supporting Bush after he was elected.

So, the question that has been asked is "considering the 180 that was done by forum leadership with Bush in 2001, would that same 180 be done with Rudy if he is elected?"

I'm not raising this point as means of supporting Rudy (because I don't) but I think the members of FR need to know how to tread going forward when posting their opinions.

[Mom MD]

I think 2 have PHd’s and the rerst either hold lesser degrees or no training at all.

[CAluvdubya]

I'm not raising this point as means of supporting Rudy (because I don't) but I think the members of FR need to know how to tread going forward when posting their opinions

Riiiiiiight! Weren't you backing up sully last night? Who's your new tag team partner?

[tiredoflaundry]

On President Reagen’s 96th birthday, Mark Levin played this speech from 1964. Even though it was 43 years ago, so many of the President’s points apply today.

It is about 30 mins. long, but it is worth the time to listen. Click on the “speaker icon”. There is commentary from Mark at the end of the speech.
Thanks to MLF for archiving the speech.

http://marklevinfan.com/index.php?s=Reagan+%2B+Goldwater

Mr. Jim, if you feel this is not appropriate for this thread,I will understand , but I thought it would help us focus.

It is also so wonderful to hear President’s Reagen’s voice again!

[rockrr]

Now that’s both funny AND offensive.....my favorite kinda post!

[Dog Gone]

You accuse others of not being entitled to opinions because you assume they don’t donate as much as you.

That's a mischaracterization of what I said, and it completely ignores the original comment to which I responded.

I really don't wish to discuss it further. Peace.

[redtetrahedron]

If we have no Washington in our time, I will take someone that can play him on tv. (Thompson)

I like that; when did he say that? Source?

[Maximus of Texas]

I was backing his question, which is what I reiterated a few posts above. No where did I see in sully’s post where he was backing Rudy. He asked a question, a very legitimate question. Would you care to answer it?

[metmom]

It’s early (which for me is before 4 PM- I’m a hardcore night person) which is probably why I didn’t pick up on it too quickly.

[jedward]

You’re here early too eh? It’s a great morning!

[Knitting A Conundrum]

For some people, it looked like the CREVO issue was just an organizing principle that gave them a chance to war from the tone of their posts...much nastiness and aggression. Each new news story was another battle to be wrought.

Not my cup of tea at all.