Will FR embrace socialism to make way for Rudy Giuliani as a Republican presidential candidate?

vanity | April 21, 2007 | Jim Robinson

[Knitting A Conundrum]

No it isn’t. Her stated purpose is to keep the GOP in charge of the White House. That’s different.

She knows everything that Rudy stands for is bad.

Too much angst is being caused by looking to the general election.

We need to focus on what’s before us, not November 2008. What’s before us is the hard work of getting a good conservative nominated. Let’s focus on the task at hand and stop killing ourselves with “What do I do if the worst happens?”

[Reagan Man]

If anyone knows why NapkinUser was zapped, please post it.

[Kryptonite]

When you find out why NapkinUser was suspended, please let me know. I was the first to recognize that, and it baffles me.

[calcowgirl]

Thanks—and you’re welcome. :-)

[EternalVigilance]

Could you tell us why NapkinUser was suspended? It’s pretty mysterious, because they have been such a solid conservative poster.

[The Spirit Of Allegiance]

Our grand business undoubtedly is,
not to see what lies dimly at a distance,
but do to what lies clearly at hand.

— Thomas Carlyle

[Tolsti]

Good riddance to liberal noise.

[EternalVigilance]

Great quote.

[Knitting A Conundrum]

And it’s time to roll up our sleeves, make contacts with others if we haven’t yet, and get organized.

[EternalVigilance]

I’m not familiar with what you’re talking about.

[Tolsti]

The banned poster.

[Reagan Man]

>>>>>We need to focus on what’s before us, not November 2008.

That's what I've been telling Chena. She isn't listening. Last resorts are called that for a reason. Broadcasting today, what you're gonna do in Nov2008, is not consistent with a last resort. Especially not on a forum populated by mostly conservatives.

[T'wit]

>> RadioAstronomer isn't here to defend himself anymore.

That's because he was thrown out for bad behavior.

[EternalVigilance]

I’ve never seen any evidence of liberalism from NapkinUser. Care to give us a link?

[Tolsti]

Well he’s banned, proof enough.

[EternalVigilance]

Well he’s banned, proof enough.

Not necessarily.

[Tolsti]

Are you suggestion a mistake might’ve been made?

[Reagan Man]

>>>>>I’ve never seen any evidence of liberalism from NapkinUser. Care to give us a link?

Ditto!

[Dad yer funny]

,,.. um , perhaps Tolsti was just making a “drive-by flipant comment” [/srcsm]

[EternalVigilance]

Are you suggestion a mistake might’ve been made?

Maybe. That's why I and others asked. We don't know what happened.