Will FR embrace socialism to make way for Rudy Giuliani as a Republican presidential candidate?

vanity | April 21, 2007 | Jim Robinson

[DCPatriot]

Now this is the second time today I dash out to run an errand and come back to craziness. Are they timing me? Should I be paranoid? LOL

LMAO!

[jedward]

Yes, getting a couple of scrapes and bruises no doubt. I’ve been shown several time how to look at people’s sign up dates. Good to meet you. I see the date that you joined too...

yield 2 the right
Since Oct 8, 2002

[processing please hold]

Is that the plural? Thank you.

[Not A Snowbird]

Good! How’s the beeber business?

[Eric Blair 2084]

The pictures on your homepage are hysterical. I just spent 10 minutes scrolling through them all. This was my favorite:

Kim Jung Il apparentry racks disiprin!!!

And I'm only halfway down the page! Wow, FReepers really raise the bar. Do you mind if I borrow some of those? I've already borrowed mkjessup's dancing MC Hammer. The Zot Bot is priceless.

[airborne]

Jim, please allow some of the banned return,

There's no real way to tell if any one of them has been permanently banned or just suspended, is there?

[ansel12]

Well it sounds like she was a sneaky person, using devious methods to crash this forum and tonite she was caught and banned by the owner.

You aren’t helping me much, I’m trying to figure out if you were being honest when you posted this, (I think I got my answer).

---

“””She is a good egg, conservative to the core and always ready to match wits with any who crosses her path. Apparently she touched a few nerves because her personal information was being passed around to other freepers with who she had conversed. The content of the information was enough that she was afraid someone could readily find her and cause harm to her or her child. She wrote to Jim and told him as much, anxiously declaring that she would hold him responsible for any harm that came to my family IF the information continued to be passed around. Obviously Jim didn’t take too kindly to that. And now you know… the rest of the story.”””

[JustaDumbBlonde]

"(format is worse than DU, LOL)"

Both are bad ... hard to say.

[X-FID]

The fact of the matter is that you are BOTH right. If you think that we have it tough on the right wing, I'll give you 30 reasons why it's even worse on the left.

Umm... FYI I was called names here not B-sharp.

Nice concept, but we are not both RIGHT---I am, and B-sharp is a pitiful lefty.

[Coyoteman]

Google Darwin Central and when you get to the site, go to the *Welcome to Darwin Central* forum.

No need to google. Here is the link: http://forum.darwincentral.org/viewtopic.php?t=923

(Thanks! You seem to be among our biggest fans!)

[jedward]

Have you ever sensed that someone might be painting a target on your back? I just felt that.

[CindyDawg]

Cindydawg

10/22/2000

[azhenfud]

"Jim, please allow some of the banned return, I think you still have their Registration email addresses right? .......Jim please keep FR from being a Purged websites due to Rudy G."

Nice you want to plead their behalf - but some of those used their free choice of association to depart...

Given that, I don't see why Jim should solicit their return.

[RockinRight]

Retread? No way. NC’s been here a long time.

[Tatze]

And over 300 posts since then.

[al baby]

Stunning interesting thread

[woofie]

[jedward]

[ozarkgirl]

I suspect you're right. You work in a place like I do, a profit bearing company, I would think you are like me and just assume, any email I send could/could not be read by the employers. I would think it's fair to assume the same thing here. If you (as a company) suspected there was a good deal of dissent. Would you read the emails you had access to? I strongly believe in a persons right to privacy, but I also know, when I write an email it work. It can be read.

Not saying that won't happen here but it could.

[Mrs.Liberty]

LOL..thanks for that pic!!!!