[Constitutions Grandchild]

I guess it’s not worth mentioning that victims don’t get trials — they haven’t been accused of anything. The accused get trials if they don’t have alibis or evidence supports their involvement. The accused in this case had alibis and would have lost at trial because of a severely tainted investigation where the victim was manipulated into identifying three young men who could not be tied to the crime.

I suppose this is irrelevant to anyone who has an agenda that is simply designed to charge someone white with the crime.

I would respectfully submit that the only way the victim in this travesty will get a fair hearing is if she is charged with filing a false police report. In which case, she could successfully argue that she had been manipulated and duped into identifying three young men. The only reason she will not get that trial these women so long for is because the State of North Carolina and the exonerated young men see no point to wasting any more time and money on a pointless endeavor which is a greater exhibition of mercy than she and these women would EVER have granted to the three young men.

[Constitutions Grandchild]

“The accused in this case had alibis and would have lost at trial because of a severely tainted investigation where the victim was manipulated into identifying three young men who could not be tied to the crime.”

Should have read: The accused in this case had alibis and THE STATE would have lost at trial because of a severely tainted investigation where the victim was manipulated into identifying three young men who could not be tied to the crime