You said — “In his own words he called his enemies ‘Christian Nazis’. He was basically Anti-American and was trying to inspire a bloody revolution.”
The problem here is that you’re trying to analyze him and his “manifesto” as if it is some kind of “coherent philosophy” and will “hold together” under examination. That idea of yours won’t work.
It won’t work because he wasn’t rational and his philosophy won’t hold together and make sense like something would for us. He’s just collected a “mish-mash” of hate ideologies and put them all together to try and justify the idea that he’s been “down-trodden” and he has to “set things straight”. It definitely does not make sense to a rational and sane person — but it does to a “whacked out” person...
That is obvious. I was pointing to evidence that proved he was not a Nazi. Which is why you started this thread.