First, I apologize for not pinging you to that post. I knew there was a comment I had which needed a second entry, but I was doing three comments at the time and screwed up. I think one should always be pinged to a comment where they are mentioned, and my ommission was an error on my part.
Second, I aired the ‘erroneous conjecture’ because first, I don’t know it to be erroneous, as it comes from someone else who may be a person with knowledge, but moreso because I disagreed with that conjecture and wanted to say so publicly because I presumed others might have the same conjecture.
The fact that Mia was banned right after posting a comment that included an irrational claim about Thompson being a “washington politician (an opinion, but one devoid of sense), along with two links to previously posted threads by Mia in the past week attacking Fred first for having “no experience” (ignoring his 8 years in the senate), and then falsely (or at least with wanton disregard for any facts) claiming that he was running just to help his good buddy McCain — and this in a vanity post asking “what does pro-life mean” in which she had just posted another comment having NOTHING to do with her own topic quoting left-wing additions to Fred Thompson’s Wiki entry to make him look bad.
Well, that was a run-on and I don’t think it’s a sentence. My point is that since April 1, Mia posted at least 2 direct attacks on Fred that had either no support or deliberately ignored facts not to her liking; she posted a vanity questioning pro-lifers commitment and saying that if they didn’t vote for a pro-abortion candidate the blood of innocents would be on their hands, and then IN that thread re-launched attacks on Fred Thompson that had NOTHING to do with the thread topic of abortion.
I am convinced that THIS is why she was booted. Well, that was the “reason” anyway, I think her deleted comments which she admitted were wrong were the excuse. If you are going to attack conservatives with little or no facts, you better make sure not to post any other lies or make false claims.
Yes, she's told me the same thing even in private correspondence. I believe the Jewish term is chutzpah. I understood the point she was trying to convey, though I didn't agree with it. And for the record, she is adamantly pro-life.
and then IN that thread re-launched attacks on Fred Thompson that had NOTHING to do with the thread topic of abortion.
I didn't see the thread or the post so I can't really comment. Thompson is not the answer to the G.O.P.'s current problem. Too bad Mike Pence will not enter the race, then we'd have a legitimate conservative for all to rally behind if Duncan Hunter fails to get legs and cover a lot of ground.
1- Mia T said Thompson has no EXECUTIVE experience, not no experience. (playing president onstage doesn't count.)
2- Mia T said Fred is part of DC power structure because in addition to serving as Sen. for 8 yrs. he was a WASHINGTON LOBBYIST FOR 18 YRS.
3- Mia T didn't CLAIM he was running to take conservatives from Rudy, she said that it was A PLAUSIBLE THEORY AND THAT THE RECENT POLL RESULTS SUPPORT THAT EFFECT.
4- Mia t didn't bring up Thompson on this thread. kevkrom did. kevkrom suggested Thompson was an example of a citizen politician. Mia T's answer refuted kevkrom's erroneous claim.
kevkrom pinged per FR's posting rules.