Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MACVSOG68

I will say that anybody who has supported what are thought to be liberal candidates here should be very cautious now NOT to post anything that is false. Two people now have been banned, both shortly after posting things that most of of knew were obviously false things. And it didn’t matter that they both asked to have their statements expunged.

I haven’t seen anybody banned yet simply for being a Rudy supporter, but it might be accurate to say that there are some who are looking for a good reason to act, so don’t give it to them.

I’m in no way agreeing with it, just an observation.

If it means I don’t have to read lies about Fred Thompson, or Mitt Romney, or Duncan Hunter, on a conservative forum, if it means I don’t have to waste my time DEBUNKING obvious lies (like Fred Thompson is a mormon? or Fred Thompson donated money last year to Hillary? — no sane person could believe those things, could they), I won’t be too upset with the policy.

And if that policy was extended to lies about Rudy, I would also be happy. It’s easy enough to debunk Rudy with the facts, we don’t need any lies.


332 posted on 04/21/2007 5:55:53 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies ]


To: CharlesWayneCT

I’ll leave the last word with you. Enjoyed the chat CW.


337 posted on 04/21/2007 6:52:54 PM PDT by MACVSOG68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson