Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MACVSOG68
Here's how you define pro-life downward:

And if you help to elect hillary clinton, you must bear the responsibility for all the deaths of all the children, unborn, living, and not yet even imagined that will flow from that election.

Those are the facts. You may not like them. They may disturb your idea of 'pro-life' as viewed through the narrow lens of abortion.

So to MiaT, if someone refuses to vote for pro-abort Rudy, they are responsible for pro-abort Hillary.

As opposed to the Rudy supporters being responsible for pushing a pro-abort candidate for the nomination in a pro-life party. It's a complete cop-out on their part, so they try to blame those who are aghast at what they are trying to do for being unwilling to be complicit in such an action.

After all, every day in this country, abortion kills as many Americans as the 9-11 attacks did.

215 posted on 04/20/2007 5:28:47 PM PDT by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08/But Fred would also be great)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies ]


To: dirtboy
So to MiaT, if someone refuses to vote for pro-abort Rudy, they are responsible for pro-abort Hillary.

Not in the primaries. In the general election, every good conservative and Republican should support the Republican candidate whoever that is. There are several I don't care much for including one of the front runners. But he, like the others in our Party are infinitely better than Hillary. My reasons may be different from MiaT, but I feel that no one should shirk their responsibility next year.

As opposed to the Rudy supporters being responsible for pushing a pro-abort candidate for the nomination in a pro-life party. It's a complete cop-out on their part, so they try to blame those who are aghast at what they are trying to do for being unwilling to be complicit in such an action.

Well, MiaT is hardly the only one supportive of Rudy or the other two who are unacceptable here. In fact some 70+ percent of Republicans support one of those three, none of whom will put abortion up as a major campaign issue. As I said earlier, most of us are pro-life to varying degrees, but there are a host of major issues facing this Nation that we need strong leadership for. Most of the social issues are simply not ripe for the campaign next year. Perhaps later or for the congressional races, but definitely not for the presidency.

After all, every day in this country, abortion kills as many Americans as the 9-11 attacks did.

I dare not say what would happen under a Hillary presidency then, as that fact cannot be discussed apparently.

You take care.

234 posted on 04/20/2007 6:01:59 PM PDT by MACVSOG68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson