I do know that in the past when I have seen someone banned that it is common to look on the last thread and question the wisdom of the banning because there can be found no post to substantiate it on the current thread.
Usually management (this is just my take you understand) sees things happening, thoughts and posts that they take to be counter to the furtherance of FR and it’s goals. And over a period of time, not just all of a sudden.
Of course sudden bannings do happen, but usually only when they are obviously very negative to FR or make it look bad. Such as "kill all democrats" or something like that. Only Shakespeare got away with that, but of course that was lawyers.
I do know that FR has withstood numerous cries of "It's dead, Jim" but it seems to keep going.
Sorry I couldn't be of much help with your question
Thank you though for your reply.
Are you obliquely referencing (aka: dancing lightly around) this thread?
Or, this one?
Sort of a sh-sh deal understood by some, unclear to others?