The United States has defined terrorism under the Federal Criminal Code. Chapter 113B of Part I of Title 18 of the United States Code defines terrorism and lists the crimes associated with terrorism[9]. In Section 2331 of Chapter 113b, terrorism is defined as:
activities that involve violent
or life-threatening acts
that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State and
appear to be intended (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and
(C) occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States
[or]
(C) occur primarily outside the territorial jurisdiction of the United States
"
Thanks for posting that official version. It doesn’t matter how many people felt fear and terror, you would have to have been asleep for the last 40 years not to know that a political message is necessary. That’s like saying every evil person is a ‘sociopath.’ Only a fool would not give real terrorists the proper attention they require by throwing every nutcase mass murderer into that box.
I don't see this as a meaningless argument.
When the ATBF calls a AK-47 with a 30 round magazine a Weapon of Mass Destruction -- WMD, they intend something by doing this. Why doesn't the laughing stock media want to show the video of 9/11 ... they don't want to inflame people. Why are the very same media doing what they are now doing, inflaming people, specifically to further the LIBERAL gun control agenda. Want more, see here
If you can't properly define evil, how can you define anything. If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck and walks like a duck ... it must be terrorism.