That’s the best you can come up with? LOL.
I see you’re either afraid or too incompetent to answer the question.
“Thats the best you can come up with? LOL.
I see youre either afraid or too incompetent to answer the question.”
I am neither afraid nor incompetent, but perhaps you are. You expanded the definition of “viability” from its original meaning in the discussion of fetal development and abortion to encompass subjects not originially argued in an attempt to strengthen your position in the argument, which is known as a strawman. You are the one who brought up physical/mental disabilities and cancer patients who cannot walk, not me. The discussion was about unborn fetuses, not people who are physically or mentally disabled or suffering from cancer. Apples and oranges, dude.
If you can’t stick to the subject at hand, then there is nothing to be gained by debating you, because your arguments are not “viable”. ;-)