Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Darwin loses again
www.evolutionnews.org ^ | 4/13/07 | Michael Egnor

Posted on 04/17/2007 8:13:01 PM PDT by conmanning1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
This guy's a neurosurgeon at Yale. Beat that Darwin!
1 posted on 04/17/2007 8:13:03 PM PDT by conmanning1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: conmanning1

Welcome to...


2 posted on 04/17/2007 8:17:06 PM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conmanning1

yawn, I’ve taught physics for premeds. for the most part, doctors are smart in that they can learn from experience.

theoretical physics is beyond them and actually theoretical anything is beyond them.


3 posted on 04/17/2007 8:17:10 PM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: staytrue

And what makes you think doctors can’t be scientists? Many of us were scientists before we were docs.


4 posted on 04/17/2007 8:22:37 PM PDT by arkfreepdom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: staytrue
I’ve taught physics for premeds. for the most part, doctors are smart in that they can learn from experience. theoretical physics is beyond them and actually theoretical anything is beyond them.

I have taught physics for premeds as well, before going to medical school. I am not sure what you are saying. There are just as many idiot MDs and Ph.Ds as there are non doctor idiots.

5 posted on 04/17/2007 8:26:28 PM PDT by outofstyle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: staytrue
I’ve taught physics for premeds

Physics was possibly my toughest course in College. Differential Equations and Finite Element Analysis seemed a snap in comparison.

6 posted on 04/17/2007 8:26:59 PM PDT by Michael.SF. (In this (political) War, Republicans are gutless appeasers. -- Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: staytrue

But, I’d bet you wouldn’t want to be treated by someone
trying a “theoretical” cure on you or anyone you
love.

Also you shouldn’t use the term “theoretical” since
the root word is “theos”(i.e. God)... in science
you should never use anything that smacks of belief in God.
Right? Maybe the term should be anthroretical, or perhaps
cerebroretical, or phrenoretical, or rna-oretical, or
string-oretical.


7 posted on 04/17/2007 8:29:31 PM PDT by Getready (Truth and wisdom are more elusive, and valuable, than gold and diamonds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: conmanning1

They pull an intellectual three card monte and the..................rubes buy it.

algore, gungrabbers, SCOTUS, etc, have learned this same game well.


8 posted on 04/17/2007 8:31:19 PM PDT by Vn_survivor_67-68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conmanning1
Interesting.

It appears that one must be seriously insecure in one's faith in order to post such drivel.

9 posted on 04/17/2007 8:31:28 PM PDT by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: staytrue

I would think a neurosurgeon should know a thing or two about biology.


10 posted on 04/17/2007 8:32:09 PM PDT by conmanning1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper

Faith? That’s a neurosurgeon speaking. Not a priest.


11 posted on 04/17/2007 8:35:07 PM PDT by conmanning1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: conmanning1

What sad drivel.


12 posted on 04/17/2007 8:37:02 PM PDT by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conmanning1

actually, a really good neurosurgeon loses a lot of general scientific knowledge as time goes on.

the same is true of a lot of phds, they know a lot about a narrow subject but were actually a much more rounded scientist before they got their doctorate.


13 posted on 04/17/2007 8:39:58 PM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: conmanning1
Faith? That’s a neurosurgeon speaking. Not a priest.

I wasn't referring to the occupation(s) of the people referenced in the article.

Why exactly did you post this?

14 posted on 04/17/2007 8:40:52 PM PDT by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: conmanning1
Saturday, March 10, 2007

The Real Question Is Would You Want Egnor As Your Doctor?

Our esteemed creationist M.D., Michael Egnor, continues distorting evolutionary theory and its relationship to medicine. In a Evolution News and Views piece yesterday, Egnor makes fun of an Alliance for Science essay contest for high school students where they are asked to answer the follwoing question: "Why would I have wanted my doctor to have studied evolution?". PZ (several times) and Orac (again, several times) demonstrate Egnor's ignorance on the topic of evolution as well as the relationship between evolutionary biology and medicine.

continued

15 posted on 04/17/2007 8:41:00 PM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conmanning1
"I would think a neurosurgeon should know a thing or two about biology."

Biology is a big field. To quote Egnor himself...

Doctors don’t study evolution. Doctors never study it in medical school, and they never use evolutionary biology in their practice. There are no courses in medical school on evolution. There are no ‘professors of evolution’ in medical schools. There are no departments of evolutionary biology in medical schools.

Now to be honest there are many doctors who do study and use evolutionary biology, but clearly Dr. Egnor admits to having no such background himself.
16 posted on 04/17/2007 8:41:28 PM PDT by ndt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: conmanning1
Another thing that makes Darwin so preposterous is the fact we can’t find anything close to Earth anywhere in the Universe. And we never will because God said he created “the Heavens and the Earth (singular).
17 posted on 04/17/2007 8:45:51 PM PDT by HisKingdomWillAbolishSinDeath (Christ's Kingdom on Earth is the answer. What is your question?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HisKingdomWillAbolishSinDeath
Another thing that makes Darwin so preposterous is the fact we can’t find anything close to Earth anywhere in the Universe. And we never will because God said he created “the Heavens and the Earth (singular).

The day is still young...

You don't mind if scientists continue looking, do you?

18 posted on 04/17/2007 8:50:06 PM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: HisKingdomWillAbolishSinDeath
"Another thing that makes Darwin so preposterous is the fact we can’t find anything close to Earth anywhere in the Universe. And we never will because God said he created “the Heavens and the Earth (singular)."

WTF?
19 posted on 04/17/2007 8:50:16 PM PDT by ndt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Getready

“Also you shouldn’t use the term “theoretical” since
the root word is “theos”(i.e. God)...”

I didn’t know that. The potential implications are quite interesting.


20 posted on 04/17/2007 8:54:22 PM PDT by RussP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson