Skip to comments.
Darwin loses again
www.evolutionnews.org ^
| 4/13/07
| Michael Egnor
Posted on 04/17/2007 8:13:01 PM PDT by conmanning1
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-85 next last
This guy's a neurosurgeon at Yale. Beat that Darwin!
To: conmanning1
To: conmanning1
yawn, I’ve taught physics for premeds. for the most part, doctors are smart in that they can learn from experience.
theoretical physics is beyond them and actually theoretical anything is beyond them.
3
posted on
04/17/2007 8:17:10 PM PDT
by
staytrue
To: staytrue
And what makes you think doctors can’t be scientists? Many of us were scientists before we were docs.
To: staytrue
Ive taught physics for premeds. for the most part, doctors are smart in that they can learn from experience. theoretical physics is beyond them and actually theoretical anything is beyond them. I have taught physics for premeds as well, before going to medical school. I am not sure what you are saying. There are just as many idiot MDs and Ph.Ds as there are non doctor idiots.
To: staytrue
Ive taught physics for premeds Physics was possibly my toughest course in College. Differential Equations and Finite Element Analysis seemed a snap in comparison.
6
posted on
04/17/2007 8:26:59 PM PDT
by
Michael.SF.
(In this (political) War, Republicans are gutless appeasers. -- Ann Coulter)
To: staytrue
But, I’d bet you wouldn’t want to be treated by someone
trying a “theoretical” cure on you or anyone you
love.
Also you shouldn’t use the term “theoretical” since
the root word is “theos”(i.e. God)... in science
you should never use anything that smacks of belief in God.
Right? Maybe the term should be anthroretical, or perhaps
cerebroretical, or phrenoretical, or rna-oretical, or
string-oretical.
7
posted on
04/17/2007 8:29:31 PM PDT
by
Getready
(Truth and wisdom are more elusive, and valuable, than gold and diamonds)
To: conmanning1
They pull an intellectual three card monte and the..................rubes buy it.
algore, gungrabbers, SCOTUS, etc, have learned this same game well.
To: conmanning1
Interesting.
It appears that one must be seriously insecure in one's faith in order to post such drivel.
To: staytrue
I would think a neurosurgeon should know a thing or two about biology.
To: elkfersupper
Faith? That’s a neurosurgeon speaking. Not a priest.
To: conmanning1
12
posted on
04/17/2007 8:37:02 PM PDT
by
facedown
(Armed in the Heartland)
To: conmanning1
actually, a really good neurosurgeon loses a lot of general scientific knowledge as time goes on.
the same is true of a lot of phds, they know a lot about a narrow subject but were actually a much more rounded scientist before they got their doctorate.
13
posted on
04/17/2007 8:39:58 PM PDT
by
staytrue
To: conmanning1
Faith? Thats a neurosurgeon speaking. Not a priest.I wasn't referring to the occupation(s) of the people referenced in the article.
Why exactly did you post this?
To: conmanning1
Saturday, March 10, 2007 The Real Question Is Would You Want Egnor As Your Doctor?
Our esteemed creationist M.D., Michael Egnor, continues distorting evolutionary theory and its relationship to medicine. In a Evolution News and Views piece yesterday, Egnor makes fun of an Alliance for Science essay contest for high school students where they are asked to answer the follwoing question: "Why would I have wanted my doctor to have studied evolution?". PZ (several times) and Orac (again, several times) demonstrate Egnor's ignorance on the topic of evolution as well as the relationship between evolutionary biology and medicine.
continued
15
posted on
04/17/2007 8:41:00 PM PDT
by
Coyoteman
(Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
To: conmanning1
"I would think a neurosurgeon should know a thing or two about biology."
Biology is a big field. To quote Egnor himself...
Doctors dont study evolution. Doctors never study it in medical school, and they never use evolutionary biology in their practice. There are no courses in medical school on evolution. There are no professors of evolution in medical schools. There are no departments of evolutionary biology in medical schools.
Now to be honest there are many doctors who do study and use evolutionary biology, but clearly Dr. Egnor admits to having no such background himself.
16
posted on
04/17/2007 8:41:28 PM PDT
by
ndt
To: conmanning1
Another thing that makes Darwin so preposterous is the fact we can’t find anything close to Earth anywhere in the Universe. And we never will because God said he created “the Heavens and the Earth (singular).
To: HisKingdomWillAbolishSinDeath
Another thing that makes Darwin so preposterous is the fact we cant find anything close to Earth anywhere in the Universe. And we never will because God said he created the Heavens and the Earth (singular). The day is still young...
You don't mind if scientists continue looking, do you?
18
posted on
04/17/2007 8:50:06 PM PDT
by
Coyoteman
(Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
To: HisKingdomWillAbolishSinDeath
"Another thing that makes Darwin so preposterous is the fact we cant find anything close to Earth anywhere in the Universe. And we never will because God said he created the Heavens and the Earth (singular)."
WTF?
19
posted on
04/17/2007 8:50:16 PM PDT
by
ndt
To: Getready
“Also you shouldnt use the term theoretical since
the root word is theos(i.e. God)...”
I didn’t know that. The potential implications are quite interesting.
20
posted on
04/17/2007 8:54:22 PM PDT
by
RussP
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-85 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson