No, actually there is virtually no difference between LIEberman and Lamont. Yes, LIEberman had been a staunch supported of the WOT and Ned isn't; however, some of that proWOT from LIEberman had already lessened quite a lot, when he ran last year.
LIEberman is worse than a "phony"; he is a semihawk, but also a socialist.
True. Lieberman is the best you’ll get from CT, though. As for Hillary, she can do a lot more damage as president than she can now, as only one senator out of 100.