Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Giuliani Is the GOP's Only Hope
Politico ^ | 4/16/07 | Brad Bannon

Posted on 04/17/2007 12:22:58 PM PDT by pissant

The conventional wisdom about presidential nomination campaigns is almost always wrong. And the pundits' dismissal of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani's bid for the Republican nomination will not improve their batting average. Even though Giuliani is way ahead of everybody in early primary polls, the experts are already writing Giuliani's obituary.

Some of this spin is wishful thinking by Democrats who don't want to face him in the general election. Other than Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.), he is better known and more popular than anyone running for president, even Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.). And Giuliani has a better chance than any other GOP candidate to turn blue states red. Depending on the Democratic presidential nominee, he could put into play states like New York, New Jersey and California that are normally off-limits to Republicans.

The rap on Giuliani is that he is a great prospect for winning the general election but has almost no chance to win the GOP nod because of his personal history and his stands on issues such as gun control and gay marriage. But there are at least a couple of reasons why he could go all the way and come out of the Republican National Convention in Minnesota as king of the hill.

First, GOP primary voters, especially born-again Christians, are so horrified at the prospect of Clinton becoming president that they would nominate the devil if they thought it would keep her out of the White House. The stronger Clinton becomes in her bid for the Democratic nomination, the better Giuliani will look to the religious fundamentalists on the Republican side who descend on the Iowa caucuses by the busload.

In backing the most electable candidate, Republican voters would be following a long history of calculation and pragmatic voting in presidential primary campaigns. In 2004, Democrats were so eager to block the reelection of President Bush that they voted with their heads for Sen. John F. Kerry (Mass.), rather than with their hearts for former Vermont governor Howard Dean.

We may finally get the dream race that everybody wanted in 2000, when then-mayor Giuliani was ready to run against then-first lady Clinton for the U.S. Senate in New York, until fate and the mayor's former wife Donna Hanover intervened.

The other factor that could propel Giuliani to victory in the Republican race is that voters, even primary voters, care more about qualities like leadership and strength than they do about the positions the candidates take on issues. In this context, the reputation for strength that Giuliani built after the Sept. 11 attacks should serve him well in his campaign to win the approval of GOP voters.

To the extent that any single issue will be a factor in voting decisions, national security will trump anything else. No Republican candidate projects the strength that a president needs to stand up to the bad guys like the one who claims that he rid New York City of thugs and saved the city from ruin on the worst day of its proud history.

As Giuliani prepares to officially announce his candidacy, he appears to be softening his position on gays and guns to appeal to the born-again Christian wing of the GOP. He said recently that gun control was good for New York City but might not work nationally. Despite his friendships with gay couples, Giuliani also announced that he was opposed to same-sex marriage. But fudging the issues is a mistake for Giuliani, because renouncing long-held beliefs undermines the reputation he has for strength and integrity.

Democratic activists are afraid of Giuliani, and Republican diehards fear him, as well. But the Bush presidency is slowly sinking into the sunset and Giuliani is the GOP's best bet to hang on to the White House.

(Brad Bannon is president of Bannon Communications Research, a Democratic polling firm in Washington).


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: electionpresident; elections; giuliani; rino; rinorudy; rudy; rudy2008; whowritesthiscrap
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-158 next last
To: pissant

If Rudy is the GOPs only hope, then we are in more serious trouble than I thought.


121 posted on 04/17/2007 3:53:31 PM PDT by DaiHuy (There is no situation so bad it cannot be made worse by the police.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
especially born-again Christians, are so horrified at the prospect of Clinton becoming president that they would nominate the devil..

Fool, no need for further review.

122 posted on 04/17/2007 3:54:24 PM PDT by j_tull (Massachusetts, the Gay State. Once the leader of the American Revolution, now leading its demise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
"Brad Bannon is president of Bannon Communications Research, a Democratic polling firm in Washington"

LOL!

123 posted on 04/17/2007 3:55:37 PM PDT by spunkets ("Freedom is about authority", Rudy Giuliani, gun grabber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Scrappleface??
124 posted on 04/17/2007 3:56:25 PM PDT by airborne (Freedom is worth fighting for !! And I'm in a fighting mood !! HUNTER 2008 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dashing doofus
To me, the title suggests that the writer thinks it is HOPELESS.

Well, when you look at the butt whoopin' we took in the midterm elections and how disgusted this nation (Conservatives, Liberals, Independents, etc.) is with our Prez and former GOP controlled Congress, it doesn't look good for our team.
125 posted on 04/17/2007 4:06:06 PM PDT by no dems (To: Our GOP Prez, Congress of big-spenders, crooks, and pedophiles: You failed us miserably.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tkathy
The republican party must adapt to the realities or the rep party will be gone with the wind.

I always thought that once someone or something "adapted" to it's "new environment" it lost it's identity. When that happens you're "gone with the wind" anyhow. Right?
126 posted on 04/17/2007 4:10:13 PM PDT by no dems (To: Our GOP Prez, Congress of big-spenders, crooks, and pedophiles: You failed us miserably.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: no dems

My great grandpa was a Republican from 1854. He is rolling in his grave right now at the way the Republicans have abandoned the great civil rights issues that the party was founded upon.


127 posted on 04/17/2007 4:23:06 PM PDT by tkathy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: tkathy

He vowed to be faithful to his wives, too. How’s that working out for him?


128 posted on 04/17/2007 4:34:51 PM PDT by Politicalmom (Better a democrat with an energized opposition than a leftist “Republican” with no opposition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: tkathy
The 80s are gone, the 1860s are gone, the demographics are changing as we speak. The republican party must adapt to the realities or the rep party will be gone with the wind.

Here's a question for you: do you believe that there are any morals/principals that are absoutely 100% non-negotiable?

Or would you be willing to allow anything as long as "the times" demand it?

That, my friend, is the difference between a liberal and a conservative.
129 posted on 04/17/2007 4:36:47 PM PDT by LightBeam (Support the Surge. Support Victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: HoustonTech

I do. He is not the candidate we need.


130 posted on 04/17/2007 4:38:27 PM PDT by MamaB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pissant

In other words, we may as well already start referring to her as “president-elect” Clinton.


131 posted on 04/17/2007 4:39:00 PM PDT by MK11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
RINO-rudy, the GOP's only hope?

Yeah...

RIIIIiiiiiiiiiiight.

132 posted on 04/17/2007 5:07:18 PM PDT by DocH (RINO-rudy for BRONX Dog Catcher 2008!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LightBeam

Politics is about convincing more people to vote for you than for the other side, not threatening to destroy the party if you don’t get your way.


133 posted on 04/17/2007 5:51:04 PM PDT by tkathy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: APFel

Rush said this:

“But we’re gearing up for this election, and if you don’t think that in the Drive-By Media and the Democrat Party, if you don’t think 2008 is all about the Clintons getting back in the White House, you’ve got another thing coming. I’m going to tell you as we sit here today, there is an 80% chance that Hillary Clinton will be the next president of the United States, if you look at the way things are falling out right now. They’re trying to take out Rudy Giuliani. Guess what? Rudy’s a “draft dodger” now. Did you see the story over the weekend? Well, Clinton was a draft dodger so they got Rudy. Rudy’s a draft dodger. Whatever was said about Clinton, they’re going after it. Rudy is a draft dodger. Rudy is a philanderer.

Whatever it is, they’re doing everything they can to take Rudy out. “

Rush Limbaugh: It’s All About the Clintons and ‘08 (80% chance HRC pres)

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1818569/posts


134 posted on 04/17/2007 5:53:11 PM PDT by FairOpinion (Victory in Iraq. Stop Hillary. Stop the Dems. Work for Republican Victory in 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: pissant
"No. There is another"
135 posted on 04/17/2007 5:57:01 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (Nobody gets me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
"We may finally get the dream race that everybody wanted in 2000, when then-mayor Giuliani was ready to run against then-first lady Clinton for the U.S. Senate in New York, until fate and the mayor's former wife Donna Hanover intervened."

The dream race that everybody wanted? Is Brad Bannon on drugs or something? That's not a dream; it's a nightmare.

Cordially,

136 posted on 04/17/2007 5:58:31 PM PDT by Diamond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Suppose Mr. Bannon has never heard of Fred or any other Republican conservative, for that matter.


137 posted on 04/17/2007 5:59:30 PM PDT by OldPossum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
I would hold on to your hat there bud...Senator Thompson will break the sound barrier with the thud the rest of the candidates will feel when the Man says "I'm in."

Just a FredHead here. Giuliani would be a lesser of two evils vote and I think Conservatives will come alive when a real Conservative throws in his hat. And a very big hat that will be!

God Bless America today as we all grieve over the senseless deaths of 32 innocents. My prayers are with the families of Virginia Tech for strength to stand proud for their loved ones.

138 posted on 04/17/2007 6:06:49 PM PDT by Bobbisox (ALL AMERICAN OLD FEMALE FREEPER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
The GOP has made conservativism unpalatable to the majority of independents and it will take time to repair the damage.

That's buying the DUline that Bush is an extreme right winger.

If the electorate is dissatisfied with an incumbent moderate Republican Adminstration, going "more moderate" is only confessing "we screwed up big time. Give us another chance. Pretty please with a cherry on top".

Even if independants are between "conservative" and "progressive" (which is not necessarily the case) why should they not choose the moderate Democrat, who doesn't have the odium associated with the incumbent?

139 posted on 04/17/2007 6:14:10 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (Being a political pundit is so easy anyone can do it, And does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: pissant
In response to the headline....

BULL!

140 posted on 04/17/2007 6:22:55 PM PDT by pointsal (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-158 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson