Some of us cannot continue to sit here and indulge in our own personal stupidity in a public place. Rush has said, and I do not believe he says this lightly, that there is an 80% chance of Mrs. Clinton being elected president in ‘08, that Obama is no threat to her and that she is using his presence to enhance herself. And you can bet your butt that the members of the democrat party will vote for whatever is presented to them as a candidate. The sulkers and threatened voting abstainers are a real threat. ANd, please, no more twaddle about third parties. We all know how well that turns out. And if you REALLY want three parties, look north to canada and see it in action. Not good.
Rush was absolutely right yesterday. He sees the writing on wall. For the others who don’t see it- it seems to be written in invisible ink!
The same scenario as they counseled in 06. It’s obvious that could care less about us, our soldiers, or the WOT.
It seems its every man for himself now, so be it.
Look, although I oppose Giuliani, I do not oppose his supporters and I will assume that they are supporting him because they believe he is in the best interest of the party and of the nation.
I would appreciate the same consideration. Whether you agree or not, people (including me) have real concerns that electing a Republican with Rudy's stances on the issues will cause more long-term harm to the GOP and the country -- because if he wins we will see many more candidates like him in the future, and the GOP's support for Constitutional government may be lost.
I would respectfully submit that you start respecting the motives of those with whom you disagree, especially if you want to change their minds. Calling people "sulkers" is insulting and counterproductive.
My suggestion, if you think the votes of people who can't support Giuliani may be decisive, is to nominate someone for whom they AND the Giuliani supporters can vote.
Best regards.