I was merely trying to point out the conflict in Rudy’s statements.
He says he’ll appoint ‘strict constructionist’ judges, but also says he supports federal funding for judges.
A ‘strict constructionist’ would not, IMO, support federal funding of abortions.
So I am quite leery of his intentions.
once Roe goes, the states can do what they want. if they want to keep abortion legal, perhaps they do want to see that poor women are not denied access to the procedure THEY have deemed legal in their states. the issue of public funding is such as it is now, because abortion has been mandated by the Court.