[BlackElk]

Mia t: So the real concern is "right wing ideologues" which is the term that means "principled and committed on issues" when uttered by Rockefeller types (lusting after the almighty dollar in the form of jobs and contracts) back when they assured us that Reagan could NEVER be elected as such a right wing nut. Oh, wait!....

If you think Dubya is a right wing ideologue, I think that must be really good stuff you are smoking but it distorts your perception of reality.

[Mia T]

It's not what I think. It's what the average voter thinks. They think Bush is a religious-right ideologue.

The Reagan analogy doesn't apply. Carter is not Bush and the clintons were not on the scene demonizing the president and the religious right.

Given the clintons' plans for the RR, it is quite ironic that the RR may in the end be the vehicle that delivers another clinton to the Oval Office.

WHY THE RELIGIOUS RIGHT MUST MOBILIZE AGAINST HILLARY:
CLINTON CONFLATES EVANGELICAL CHRISTIANS AND ISLAMO-FASCIST TERRORISTS


AFTERWORD: A Note to the Religious Right


What's black and white and read all over and is more self-destructive than pre-9/11 thinking?
Pre-clinton thinking, that's what....
Putting doctrinal purity ahead of making sure a defective and dangerous clinton never again controls this country is pre-clinton thinking.
We no longer have the luxury of time or circumstance to massage our sensibilities, to indulge our indignations.
We will not survive another clinton. (We may yet not survive the first.)

[stephenjohnbanker]

“I don’t know but if you go with a gun grabbing, illegal alien pandering, gay rights supporting abortionist liberal like Rudy as your “conservative” standard bearer you’re going to have a whole lot more than OH and PA to worry about.

43 posted on 04/16/2007 5:08:15 PM PDT by Jim Robinson

Yep, you can write off the south, midwest, and much of the west too!!