Sorry, I dont have the book handy, I just remember reading it years ago.
You are citing a book you read years ago, whose original citation you therefore do not have, as evidence that some living elephant was radiocarbon dated to 3,000 years ago? And this is supposed to show that the radiocarbon method is not accurate?
I would need more evidence than that before I made such a claim.
Unless you can provide some support, such as a reference to the original article that supports your claim, I am going to regard your claim as unsubstantiated.
Argumentum ad chutzpah.