Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bouchart

Good luck with all that....


33 posted on 04/14/2007 11:33:55 PM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: abb; Howlin; All

The Sunday N&O part two of the series article is up:

http://www.newsobserver.com/100/story/564477.html

“Behind the bold words, a case starts to unravel

District Attorney Mike Nifong brusquely rejects defense lawyers’ overtures and an offer to share information. The
emerging evidence does not support his certainty

Joseph Neff, Staff Writer

During the first half of April 2006, lawyers for Duke lacrosse players often sat around a large table in Bill Thomas’ second-floor conference room, a stone’s throw from the Durham County courthouse. Conversation invariably turned to which players would be indicted. “We guessed it would be the three residents of the house,” Thomas said. “But we really had no clue. None.”
The lawyers thought District Attorney Mike Nifong was unpredictable. Stunned by his public statements, which grew more strident, defense lawyer Joseph B. Cheshire V tried to talk with the prosecutor.Cheshire didn’t know that Nifong harbored a visceral dislike for him; all four of Cheshire’s namesakes were lawyers, and Nifong often referred to Cheshire sneeringly as “Joseph Blount Cheshire the Fifth.”

Cheshire wasn’t prepared for the prosecutor’s response to his request to talk, which Nifong’s paralegal dictated to Cheshire’s paralegal: Nifong “is not going to talk with any attorneys while there have been no charges filed, and ... if Joe Cheshire feels that his client should be charged, then he should tell the police department.””


34 posted on 04/15/2007 12:06:45 AM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson