Posted on 04/12/2007 9:34:54 AM PDT by TexConfederate1861
Of course you don't. But you can't show anything to show that they didn't.
fyi, that is NOT (as YOU are WELL aware) a PRIMARY source.
Your hyperactive imagination does not count as a primary source.
Did you check Arkansas or Texas census? During this time, the Waties were in Arkansas 1854 and a few years longer. They also went to Texas where other relatives had a settlement. They were on the move to avoid assassination by Ross contingents.
laughing AT you, PROPAGANDIST! (i've noted recently that you are not up to your usual ability to respond to questions. are you DRINKING???)
free dixie,sw
as usual, you're trying DESPERATELY to deceive your readers, but EVERYONE is "onto your game".
that's why you are laughed AT & RIDICULED as a "none too bright" LIAR!
laughing AT you, TROLL.
free dixie,sw
And when have you ever provided any PROOF whatever for your IDIOTIC contentions? From the South ending slavery in 7 year post rebellion to Stand Watie being some sort of poverty stricken slob to, well, to anything at all? You spout the most outrageous nonsense, offer absolutely nothing to support your stupid claims, and then have the audacity to criticize others. I no longer laugh at you, I truly pity your delusional rants and raves.
'ole pal, based on YEARS of "dealing with you", you're LOSING IT! whatever you're drinking must be STRONG.
fyi, your responses USED to be at least SMART, though WRONG. now they're just DUMB & PITIFUL.(could it be that you've figured out that you basic premises are fatally FLAWED???)
free dixie,sw
Post 666. Somehow very appropriate.
it's NOT too uncommon for southrons to consider the DYs to be IN "the belly of THE BEAST"!
free dixie,sw
Don't worry. A HATE-filled/BIGOTED/empty-HEADED/arrogant pserson did.
LOL!
If it is a direct, verbatim quotation of the actual person's writings, which were written by an involved person contemporaneously with the question under discussion, it is a primary source. Diaries, letters from participants, court testimony, census records - any first person account is a primary source. "On Tuesday, Johnny shot at me."
A secondary source would be a non witness recounting, such as a newspaper story, or someone relating something not personally participated in. For example, a footnoted text. "Last Tuesday, it was reported by Joe Doe that John Smith shot at him."
A tertiary source would be someone claiming that a second person told them about something the second person ALSO didn't have first hand knowledge of, all without primary documentation. "My friend, Miss Grey, said that she read that John Smith once shot at Joe Doe."
Just watched History Channels, Sherman’s March. Any comments? I thought a much better effort should have been made. I loath the rehashing of what was said earlier, after a commercial break. Time that could have been spent in better detail.
I agree a better job could have been done. I watched the first half and fell asleep during the second. Nothing new from what I recall seeing.
free dixie,sw
So now you believe that your freepmails to me were "confidences"?
NO??? i thought NOT, as you are BOTH a DUNCE & a little, HATE-filled, ignorant, TROLL.
as i've said, you RUINED yourself to most people on FR & "shot yourself in the foot".
PITY, that you're too clueLESS to KNOW that you're "toast".
laughing AT you, empty-headed TROLL!!!
free dixie,sw
Did you not understand the words "By the way, if you want to communicate these sorts of threats, have the courage to do it in the public forum where everyone can see it. If it happens again, I’ll post all your messages to me onto the boards."
Didn’t get to see it, but a friend at work told me about it this AM.
He said - AMAZINGLY - that the History Channel told about how Sherman basically MASS MURDERED the blacks who tried to follow him out of Savannah; and what an incredible racist Sherman was.
I knew that Sherman ALLOWED the blacks to drown in the Savannah. I didn’t know that he actually had the bridge cut, CAUSING them to drown.
Sherman was a war criminal, just like his boss.
Both men show have hung for their war crimes.
Not very surprising that Lincoln was admired by the two greatest tyrants in the history of the world - Marx and Hitler - is it?
still, every time you "violate private communications" (you DO understand the meaning of "PRIVATE MESSAGE", don't you, TROLL???)you HURT yourself WORSE. otoh, you probably CANNOT look WORSE than you already do in the eyes of FReepers.
my correspondents think you're a DUNCE & a TROLL, just as i do.PITY that you don't "get it".
laughing AT you,DUNCE/HATER/ TROLL.
free dixie,sw
free dixie,sw
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.