Clearly you have poor reading comprehension and lack of even minimal research skills -- How did Keyes get into this discussion? 68
Do you have anything intelligent to add to the actual discussion? Considering your other post, I doubt it.
Your incompetence caused you to be in error. Then when I point out that error to you, you have the gall to turn it on me. You're compounding your error. But hey, that's your problem -- not mine. Deal with it. Or don't. It makes no difference to me.
You're a hoot.
Your doing great as adebate moderator. :)
In fact, I never go after a poster until they first make a personal attack on me. Then the gloves are off. Some, like you apparently, have absolutely no interest in the thread itself, but simply want to start a fight. That seems to be the limit of your capacity.
Your incompetence caused you to be in error. Then when I point out that error to you, you have the gall to turn it on me. You're compounding your error. But hey, that's your problem -- not mine. Deal with it. Or don't. It makes no difference to me.
You are either just a young kid or you do need help. Think for a minute just how important that was. The argument, not the author was at issue. I mistakenly thought the author was the poster. So what? He corrected me, but the arguments did not change because Keyes wrote it rather than the poster. It certainly didn't do much for my opinion of Keyes, but that's another issue.
Posters such as you are a dime a dozen. I see them on threads where their response to a well thought out post was to criticize the failure to use spell check, or some other meaningless error having nothing at all to do with the thread.
I'll try again. Do you have anything of substance on the issues we have been discussing?