Well, if I thought I had superior intellect before this thread, you and several other "Freepers", so to speak, have certainly done little to disprove that.
Wow. You still don't get it. You disproved it yourself. You are right about it taking little for FReepers to disprove your asserted superior intellect.
Your posts and those of a few others have done far more to demonstrate my superior intellect than anything I could have said or done. Thank you.
Your arrogance has grown as hollow as a dry well. You've been, actually your arguments have been thoroughly trounced yet you still declare yourself the victor. Reminds me of the bloody knight in a Monty Python movie with his arms and one leg cut off continuing his challenge to his opponent, and the opponent replies: "what are you going to do, bleed on me?!"
In fact it was you who inserted yourself into a discussion between me and another poster. I had not directed any comments to you nor did I insinuate anything derogatory about you, until you made a complete fool of yourself.
Yes I engaged you in discussion but not the person you were in a discussion with. I didn't engage or challenge what you were discussing with that other poster. I engaged/challenged you on what you were proclaiming about yourself -- that you proclaimed you had superior intellect compared to many Freepers. I didn't get between you and another poster I got in your face to challenge (and laugh at) your pompous arrogance. And basically have had you eating your own words. Like most of your arguments in your and my discussion your above argument has been refuted.
Two of us traded insults and you somehow felt it was your place to challenge me alone.
I challenged you to back up you claim of superior intellect. You proclaiming your superior intellect is not an insult directed at the other poster. ...It's an assertion you made about yourself. That is what I challenged. Of course, I have already explained this to you so either you chose to ignore it or you failed to comprehend. So much for superior intellect, eh?
You looked for a totally meaningless mistake and decided to take me on, not for the purpose of the thread, but to simply for a food fight.
You set yourself up as the supposed superior intellect compared to many Freepers. In your very next post you demonstrated that was false. That, I thought, was down right hilarious, so I challenged you on it.
Read it and weep...
|
To: EternalVigilance; MACVSOG68
This is just too good not to make fun of. Talk about irony!!
He wrote the article we're discussing.69 MACVSOG68, how does your foot taste? Shall I reload so you can shoot yourself in your other foot. |
You were quick to shoot your other foot. Continuing on to other limbs with your subsequent posts. You're just like the bloody night.
Is that anything like the bloody knight? LOL!
Comprehension is also not one of your strong suits. I said Freepers have done little to disprove my superiority (you claim I have). There's a large difference between that and what you concluded. But that doesn't surprise me.
Your arrogance has grown as hollow as a dry well.
Well, when confronted with the total sum of your intelligence, it's difficult not to be arrogant.
You've been, actually your arguments have been thoroughly trounced yet you still declare yourself the victor.
No, that's simply one more of your false conclusions. I never declare victory in a reasoned debate. I merely make my points and let others decide the merits. As for being trounced, perhaps, though deep down I believe you know otherwise. At this point I wouldn't expect any concession from you, though up to this point you've not really discussed anything about the thread itself with me, so I'm not sure how you measure "trouncing".
I engaged/challenged you on what you were proclaiming about yourself -- that you proclaimed you had superior intellect compared to many Freepers.
This, of course, is one more of your little "misrepresentations" of the truth. You have posted what I said a dozen times in a vain attempt to make it into something it's not. I simply responded to an insult that "you have someone who can read and write and use a tad of logic." It was directed to the poster, and you can neither show that I intended it to apply to others or that I somehow intended to imply superior intellect.
I mentioned you might be a high school student earlier taking a logic class and were perhaps practicing. Hopefully for you, it is a public school and you'll pass anyway.
You were quick to shoot your other foot. Continuing on to other limbs with your subsequent posts. You're just like the bloody night.
LOL. No offense, but Knight is spelled with a "K".
As I've said before many times, posters who cannot engage meaningfully in a debate try desperately to bring down the opponent on personal terms. That would seem to be your M.O.
Oh, the bottom feeders are fun....at times.