Of course I understand the things you are asking and commenting on.
Why are you intent on arguing these things?
All I asked was to watch the film. It would be fun to discuss it. What’s wrong with that?
Were you drawing a conclusion from circumstantial evidence? Was it was an educated guess?
Why are you intent on arguing these things?
Why do you say things that you refuse to back up?
It would be fun to discuss it.
Does the film say stuff like "the Fed Reserve is not federal but is owned by private individuals"? Or stuff like "That they are mostly foreign owned banks"? Or like this, " The IRS is a tool of foreign citizens"?